By Tara Stickley
November 13, 2020
Writing on the eve of Donald Trump’s Inauguration Day nearly four years ago, writer Tara Stickley (class of 2013) lamented that a Barbie Doll-esque image of women perpetrated by events like the Miss USA Pageant (owned by Trump for nearly 20 years) would soon also infiltrate the White House, where “reductive imaging…of women into a sleek, airbrushed, and anonymous formality is one of the ways femininity is leveled and power is taken.” And the past several years under President Trump’s regime have seen Stickley’s prediction come to pass. From the icy reserve of former supermodel and current First Lady Melania Trump, to the bubble-headed fictions of Kayleigh McEnany’s White House press conferences, to—most chillingly—the assumption of power by Ivanka Trump in her role as Senior Advisor to the President, this administration has made a distinct point of appointing women manicured to Westernized standards of beauty and no other credentials to authoritative positions.
With the impending ascendancy of Joe Biden to the Presidency, a paradigm shift seems promising, as along with it comes the ascendancy of Kamala Harris to the office of Vice President. The first biracial woman to be elected to this position, along with her long history in politics and law, bodes well for the corner we might turn not only in optics, but in actual practice. So too does the extraordinary efforts of Stacey Abrams, formerly of the Georgia House of Representatives, in her campaign to register nearly 800,000 new voters in the state of Georgia. One hopes the incoming Biden administration will see fit to put her, and other qualified women, into Cabinet seats and other appointments of consequence.
Until then, it is incumbent upon all of us to reflect on the ways in which the worth of a woman is perceived in our culture, as Stickley did here in her 2017 piece, “Wet Suits and Male Gaze.“
—Jessica Holmes, Editor-in-Chief
“Men look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at. This determines not only most relations between men and women but also the relation of women to themselves. The surveyor of a woman in herself is male: the surveyed female. Thus she turns herself into an object—and most particularly an object of vision: a sight.” –John Berger, Ways of Seeing
A few weeks before Donald Trump’s inauguration, and just hours before the passing of the light that was John Berger, I was looking at vibrant but plaintive representations of women’s bodies in a small gallery in North Little Rock, Arkansas. There was a bronze one-piece bathing suit crumpled at my feet, and three paintings of quartered female figures hung on the surrounding walls. It felt like a weird twist in the spiral of history to be here in 2017: a woman ill-at-ease in her native South, with a handsy chauvinist flimflamming his way into the presidency. This very same man owned the Miss USA pageants for nearly two decades, and those perfected images of women with their frozen smiles and stiletto-stilted gaits streamed in to my childhood home and had made me uneasy even as a kid. I knew they were a fabrication, a disempowerment. This reductive imaging persists still in places like beauty competitions, ad spaces, selfie culture, and now the White House, where the abstraction of women into a sleek, airbrushed, and anonymous formality is one of the ways femininity is leveled and power is taken.
Alika Cooper’s bronze sculpture titled Wet Suit II appears abandoned on a raised tile platform at Good Weather gallery. It was made through what the artist called “a kind of choreographed action that mimicked disrobing,” whereupon a wax-drenched bathing suit was “flung” to the ground and then cast in molten metal using the lost wax method. For the paintings—which also quietly reference a disappearing craft, that of quilting—the LA-based artist began with solid cotton fabrics that were meticulously painted in gradients and then collaged onto panels. The photographs of Jacques Henri Lartigue and Helmet Newton, and those of 1940s bathing suit models were points of departure for the compositions, but Cooper’s readings of the images involve her zooming in and dramatically cropping the female forms she’s extracted from the fabric of Western visual history.
These appliqué paintings at Wet Suits are on approach succinct, then sfumato, then scalpel sharp at closest proximity. Light, in a warm gradient of polluted sunset, seems to emanate from within the female forms. The colors rush: sliced pamplemousse, an innermost ring of plum, chartreuse and peach fuzz, and then currant juice becoming the pitch of diluted ink. Wet skin and salt are evoked by the figures stripped down to their bathing suits, but these dank, earthly elements are decidedly not around. The painted fabric forms don’t quite denote flesh, but are more like vessels for a Rococo-hued heat. While the panels are small—the largest being only 24 x 20″—the segmented framing of the figure suggests a monolithic and uncontainable force, like the wind roving over a landscape. Power and immensity are conveyed through the Picasso-like proportions and, paradoxically, through the fact that the women’s bodies are fragmented and mostly out of frame. Like prehistoric fertility fetishes, the forms call forth a largely ignored, but primordial truth: beauty and power are simultaneously and irrevocably present in the feminine. In those visual lineages that have continuity with their ancient representations of femininity—as in the case of Indian art—women were depicted as equally animated and decisive as males from antiquity on, though many of those cultures have in the more recent past westernized their images of women.
In 21st century America, women—notwithstanding a privileged few—are encouraged to inhabit one side of the visual binary: empowerment or beauty. To be a woman taking power is to be desexualized, outcast, and resented (Hillary Clinton). The alternative—to be seen as beautiful, to be desired—means shrinking (to use Nigerian novelist Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s term from the essay “We Should All Be Feminists”) oneself down to the dimensions of an object to be acted upon. In our enduring patriarchy, women are still hyper-sexualized into banality, or abused into submission, or just simply ignored if they complicate the dichotomy of power versus beauty. This is often true in politics, it’s sadly the case in the history of Western painting, and for most of us women, it’s also regrettably true in our daily lives.
John Berger, in his classic but ever-pertinent demystification of Occidental art, Ways of Seeing, described the historical inability of male artists to grapple simultaneously with the immensity of feminine force and with beckoning, arresting beauty. And so, he asserts, women were abstracted into nudes. “Almost all post-Renaissance European sexual imagery is frontal—either literally or metaphorically.” Denuded of their particularities, their volition, and even their flaws, women in Western painting were time after time rendered full-frontal, passive, and slack. In his heartbreaking clarity and concision, Berger wrote, “Men act, women appear,” and further noted:
“The absurdity of this male flattery reached its peak in the public academic art of the nineteenth century. Men of state, of business, discussed under paintings like this. When one of them felt he had been outwitted, he looked for consolation. What he saw reminded him he was a man.”
Women turn away from the viewer in the paintings at Wet Suits. Incomplete and shifting, their bodies inscribe movement, and thus volition. Turned away from us, black hair spills like oil over the bronzed shoulders of a figure framed within a Burgundy-soaked panel. The precisely cut edges describe the soft, curving, downward-moving line of a bare shoulder. She becomes a landscape, more of a dark floodwater roiling down a mountain than a figure painting.
That women could possibly be grasped in areductive image or, let’s say, “grabbed by their pussies” is a lie that the weak and fearful tell themselves in order to feel power for a moment. This is stolen power, and misogyny itself is nothing more than the hateful realization that stolen power won’t last. Women in their multitudinous particularity cannot be represented, unless they are perceived in the totality of their creative force, strength, and beautiful perseverance. Abrasive, singular, flawed, and miraculously resilient—these facets of femininity are what have been far too often underrepresented. The women in Alika Cooper’s work call us back to this truth by returning us to that which hasn’t been properly imagined in Western painting; and so her women turn away, or abandon their leaden garments, and they demand that we look again.
Alika Cooper: Wet Suits was on view at Good Weather gallery from November 24, 2016–January 14, 2017.